Everyone’s Gone To the Movies: Christopher Nolan’s early, popular and weird films

Christopher Nolan in 2024

I would be hard pressed to name a more interesting activet film director than Christopher Nolan. His upcoming adaptation of Homer’s The Odyssey is the most anticipated movie of the summer, and with Oppenheimer, he managed to turn a historical science drama dealing with anti-semitism and quantum mechanics and having no digital effects into a summer blockbuster.

To me, the most fascinating thing about Nolan is what a varied library of films he’s produced over his nearly 30-year career so far.

I would never try to name his best film or try to rank his works from best to worst. But I will discuss my favorites of the dozen feature films so far in his filmography.

Favorite Early Film – The Prestige 

The Prestige was one of two Victorian-era magician films to come out in 2006 (along with Neil Burger’s The Illusionist), both of which, in my view, were excellent. But The Prestige stood out for its imaginative storytelling. It is the tale of two competing magicians played by Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale (who has been in a number of Nolan’s films, including his Dark Knight trilogy) with Michael Caine (another Nolan regular) playing an ingénieur (or magic trick engineer). But the most notable performance is from David Bowie playing a fictionalized version of the enigmatic electrical engineer Nikola Tesla.

The movie’s title, as Caine explains, is part of the structure of a magic trick: The pledge, the turn, and the prestige. And the movie’s screenplay (co-written by Christopher and his brother Jonathan) follows that same structure. (There’s a great explanation of this from Michael Caine in the trailer below.)

The Presige, despite coming after Nolan’s massive success of Batman Begins, qualifies in my mind as the last of his early films, being a relatively small-budget production of unfamiliar material.

If you have not seen it yet, do no research on the movie or the book. Just sit down in a darkened room and be prepared to be transported into a world of magic, competition and revenge.


Favorite Blockbuster – Dunkirk

Nolan has made so many acclaimed blockbusters – his multi-Oscar winning Oppenheimer; his genre-defining The Dark Knight with Heath Ledger’s astonishing turn as the Joker; or his time-bending science-fiction epic Interstellar that has been compared to Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey – all of which were financially, artistically, and dramatically successful. But it was the smallest of his “big” films (with a budget of $100 million), Dunkirk, that has left the strongest impression on me.

Dunkirk tells the story of the small-boats rescue flotilla sent out to bring home the British troops trapped on the beaches of France in 1940. The movie, shot primarily on IMAX 70mm film, tells the story over three timelines:

  • Over one week from the point of view of the soldiers trapped on the beaches of Dunkirk;
  • Over one day from the point of view of one of the small boats sent in to rescue the troops;
  • And over one hour, from the point of view of a fighter pilot trying to protect the troops.

The three narratives are woven together throughout the film, and though three timelines could be a mess, instead they show a converging story where the three narratives all end at the same point. Dunkirk could easily be compared to Kubrick’s 2001 because it has very little dialog, telling the story instead primarily through cinematography, sound effects, and a stunning score by Hans Zimmer.  (I’m not generally a huge Zimmer fan, but his score brilliantly advanced the tension within Dunkirk.)

I was fortunate enough to see Dunkirk during its initial IMAX run, but it is worth seeing under whatever format you have available. But like so many of Nolan’s films, it calls for watching with your full attention in a darkened room.

Dunkirk has an ensemble cast including Fionn Whitehead, Harry Styles, Barry Keoghan, Kennth Branagh, Cillian Murphy, Mark Rylance and Tom Hardy. But this is not a story of stars or celebs – it’s the visual storytelling that matters.


Favorite “weird” film – Tenet

It is only fair to note that many of Nolan’s films could fall into a range of categories. For example, his debut commercial film Memento would fall into both the “weird” category and “early” category; and Interstellar, with its strongly non-linear and time-bending structure, could be both a “blockbuster” and “weird” film. But I will hold up his COVID pandemic release of Tenet as my favorite of his weird films.

Tenet is the only one of Nolan’s films that could potentially be considered a flop, having been released in the fall 0f 2020, when theaters were just beginning to reopen from the pandemic lockdown. As I wrote at the time:

The release has not gone particularly well.  Made on a budget of $200 million, Tenet has made $45 million in the US and $262 million internationally. And it’s not because people aren’t interested in seeing it – they’re just not ready, at least in most of the US, to go out to the movies.

I went to see Tenet at my local theater last Sunday at a 1 p.m. matinee.  I figured it would be reasonably safe given that I was expecting only sparse attendance at that time for a movie that had been in theaters for a month.  I was correct.  There were about 7 people total at the screening in a mid-sized theater at my local multiplex.

It was great fun to go see my first movie in a theater since probably February of this year.  Popcorn, a Diet Pepsi, and a darkened theater with a bigger than life movie.  Admittedly, it was not the same as going to Council Bluffs to see the latest Nolan release at the IMAX as I had been hoping to back in December, but it was still a lot of fun.

(Tenet ended up earning $58 million in the US and a total of $365 million globally.)

But Tenet was also a challenging film. It was an action thriller that moved in two temporal directions at once. Guns fired ammo that moved back in time, cars drove backwards down the road and through time, commando teams attacked a single target in a “temporal pincer move.” Don’t try to make sense of you. You won’t be able to. It’s a hoot to watch as long as you don’t really try to make sense of it. Most of Nolan’s films play around with timelines to some degree, but for Tenet, the screwy timeline was the central point.

For me, I think Nolan was trying to get back to the level of weirdness he was allowed to have when he made low-budget movies. But it was a bit too much for a big budget pandemic-era movie to carry.


Following – The freshman film that tells you exactly who Nolan will be as a director

Following was Nolan’s first movie, shot in black & white on 16 mm film, that he  self-financed with mostly friends and relatives as actors. It’s a neo-noir crime thriller that is told out of sequence where you are never quite sure what’s going on until the final reel. It’s a surprisingly good movie given it was shot on weekends over a several-month period where the film was being paid for each week out of Nolan’s day-job paycheck.

The amazing thing about Following is that you can see in it almost every central characteristic of Nolan’s subsequent films. It’s a tight 70-minute flick, and is well worth a view on the library-connected Kanopy streaming service. (Kanopy is a free movie and TV streaming service connected the e-book and audiobook library service Libby/OverDrive. You log in using your credential from your local public or academic library.)


So, what are your favorite Christopher Nolan films? Let us know what you think in the comments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fun with Mando and Baby Yoda

Poster for Star Wars: The Mandalorian and GroguI went to see director Jon Favreau’s  Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu at The Grand Theater in downtown Lincoln, NE Thursday at 9:40 a.m. with my Dear Wife. That may be the earliest screening either of us have seen at a movie theater. I had been looking forward to M&G quite a bit as I had enjoyed the Disney+ series chronicling the adventures of Mando and Baby Yoda.

The Grand is a great place to see a movie, especially on the Ultra DLX screen. It’s not quite IMAX size, and it follows normal widescreen format; but otherwise, it’s nearly the equal of the iconic giant screen experience. And the Grand is only two hours away from home for us out here on the prairie. On the other hand, when I go to the Twin Cities to visit my 98-year-old dad, the IMAX is only 5 minutes away…

So, the critics have been relatively ‘meh’ on the film, giving it a “it’s fine” rating of 62%, making it neither “Rotten” or “Fresh” at review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. David Sims’ Atlantic review is pretty typical with the uninspiring headline “A Star Wars Movie to Fall Asleep to.” He writes:

“Compared with the most recent Star Wars films, which prompted fierce debate, The Mandalorian and Grogu seems unlikely to truly offend anyone; it is neither a confusing mess nor so offbeat as to divide the fan base. Instead, it’s content to be a nothing burger, two dutiful hours of laser blasts and flat dialogue that will do just enough to keep toys stacked on shelves.”

I can’t disagree with Sims’ review in principle, but I must admit that I did enjoy M&G. The movie was a fun visit to Star Wars friends with a great score, a dose of humor, and a storyline that didn’t demand a master’s degree in Star Warsology. Would I have liked something more? Of course! Did that keep me from having a good time and a smile on my face leaving the theater? Nope? (My Dear Wife enjoyed being out on an out-of-town date, but was not as generous in her response to the movie.)

Louis Chilton, writing for Britain’s The Independent, had what I think is the most fair critical reaction to the film, which pretty much matches my own feelings. With a $165-million world opening weekend, M&G had the lowest modern opening for a Star Wars movie, even less than the financially disappointing Solo: A Star Wars Story. What Chilton says doesn’t get mentioned nearly as much, is that M&G cost only a little more than half of what Solo did, so even with a fairly modest opening (and we are seriously calling $165 million “modest”?) it is still going to make lots of money for The Mouse. It also keeps the adorable Grogu/Baby Yoda in the cultural forefront, it gives a fun family movie experience, and it isn’t weighed down by the enormous level of lore that helped sink 2019’s Episode 9 – The Rise of Skywalker. (Critically sink it… the ninth outing of the original series made more than $1 billion globally.) Perhaps even more importantly, after a host of announced and cancelled Star Wars films, this one made it out the door.

Chilton also is unreserved in his praise for Ludwig Göransson’s score. It’s an impossible task for any composer to live up to the legacy of the John Williams’ nine scores for the Skywalker-themed stories, but he has created a new, gorgeous collection of themes to move the franchise forward. (Göransson is best known for scoring Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther movies along with last-year’s standout Sinners.)

So, would I have liked this to have been a better movie? Sure, why not? But Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu gave me movie joy at the start of the summer. I fell in love with the original Star Wars back when it was initially released back in 1977 when I infamously went to see it every weekend at my local theater in central Iowa. (Yes, I saw it 13 times in its initial release…. This was before home video, and I really liked it…) And now that the franchise is approaching 50 years old, I’m not looking for it to provide the thrills it gave me as a 17-year-old. (Though the Disney+ series Andor has absolutely breathed new life into a franchise that has in many way played out.)

Meanwhile, I can’t wait for Christopher Nolan‘s July release of The Odyssey. I’m going to have a lot to say about both Nolan and his Odyssey as the summer progresses, but you can’t accuse the British auteur of making the same movie over and over again. Apart from his excellent Dark Knight trilogy, all of  his films have been unique and individual.

What did you think of Mando and Baby Yoda? And what are you looking forward to this summer?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Did no one pay attention to what the creation of Skynet led to?

Image of The TerminatorArtificial Intelligence, AI, especially in its generative AI large language model form, has taken front and center lately in the discussion of contemporary culture. There are all of the awful AI-generated political memes out there, deepfake nude images, faulty legal briefs with “hallucinated” citations, student essays and online discussion board posts created by ChatGPT and its various relations, and endless social media posts with dubious connections with reality created by bots.

There’s even a name for all this stuff – AI Slop. And it’s showing up everywhere in online culture and in our classrooms.

This is an AI-generated image of President Trump as a Jesus-like figure healing a man. After the president was criticized for sharing the image, he told CBS News, ““I viewed that as a picture of me being a doctor in fixing — you had the Red Cross right there, you had, you know, medical people surrounding me,” he said. “And I was like the doctor, you know, as a little fun playing the doctor and making people better. So that’s what it was viewed as. That’s what most people thought.”

President Donald Trump is fond of sharing AI images of himself looking incredibly buff in rather extreme situations, but he did generate some rare criticism from his supporters when he posted an image depicting him as Jesus healing a sick man. The president’s social media team soon took the image down, and Mr. Trump said he thought the image was just depicting him as a doctor helping people get healthy.

I saw a discussion on one of the microblogging services (X, Threads, Bluesky, etc.) earlier this week asking whether teachers still thought there was any point in having online discussion boards when a goodly percentage of students just feed the prompt into ChatGPT and get something that looks like academic writing. (The discussion actually led to some really good ideas being shared to help steer students away from the world of AI.)

I found it discouraging over the last year to see how many of my students tried to use generative AI to complete their homework. If a student does nothing more than feed the assignment prompt into the AI model and use directly what is generated, it’s pretty easy to recognize that it is not authentic student work. And while I recognize that being able to use AI in a work environment may be an important skill going forward, that was not among the skills I was teaching in my communication law, comm and society, and media literacy classes.

There’s been a huge amount of AI in the news as of late – here’s a sampling of recent stories worth paying attention to:

And finally…

Do any of you remember watching James Cameron’s 1984 film The Terminator about a relentless killer robot (played by Arnold Schwarzenegger) powered by a self-aware AI network called Skynet? No particular reason for asking…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Questions Worth Asking (Maybe): Perfect transcript, Perfect Jeopardy player, Imperfect corporate retreat, Perfect novelist

  • Why should every student should get their first “B” as soon as possible? (Atlantic gift Link)
    As a long-time college professor, one of my biggest frustrations was having students who were desperate to maintain their perfect 4.0 GPA. I had one of my best students ever avoid taking a statistics class because they were afraid they might get a B in it. Years later, once they were a prominent college professor, they admitted that had been a big mistake. The Atlantic just ran a recent article discussing the grade inflation crisis at Harvard University where students feel entitled to a perfect GPA when they are spending so much money on their education.One of the biggest problems I see looking back at higher ed these days is that too many people think education is about building a perfect resume or getting the best paying job rather than being about becoming a well-rounded, educated person. Building resumes and setting up great careers are both important. But so is getting a good education.
  • Why does everyone love Jeopardy champ Jamie Ding? (NY Times gift Link)
    Dear Wife and I are die-hard daily Jeopardy fans, and we love seeing someone go on an extended run on the show. But it is easy to start getting annoyed with a player whose streak has gone on too long.Except when that player is the unfailing nice Jamie Ding.

    Ding described himself as a “faceless bureaucrat and law student” in his nightly introduction, but the realty that he downplayed was that his day job is providing affordable housing to people in New Jersey. He charmingly always dressed with an orange item of clothing, he unfailingly applauded good plays by his opponents, and he never seemed to have an ego problem. At a time where we seem to be celebrating performative cruelty in our country, Jamie Ding was an incredible breath of fresh air.

  • Why don’t you want to model your corporate retreat on a reality show competition? (WSJ gift link)
    When our second son was nearing delivery, I told my Dear Wife that she should plan on giving birth on a specific day so I could miss a day-long departmental retreat. When the day arrived, she woke up at 5 a.m. and told me I would not have to go to the event.Now, the retreat I was trying to avoid was just a day of endless meetings on campus, but sometimes work retreats can go horribly wrong. And sometimes those horrid outcomes could have been easily predicted.

    In 2017, the tech company Plex planned a $500,000 retreat at a beach-front hotel  in Honduras with a Survivor reality show theme. What could possibly go wrong?  Well, hiring an ex-Navy SEAL to run physical challenges for out-of-shape tech employees might have been the first mistake. Hiring a hotel to host that was going through management changes and had no idea how to serve a big group event was likely the second.

    The Wall Street Journal link tells a horror story of alligators, fire ants, and food poisoning.  But at least some of the participants report nearly ten years later that the retreat was a great bonding experience and “one of the most fun trips ever.” Sure… I’m just glad I avoided my retreat and got a great kid instead.

  • And finally – Why do I love Florida writer Carl Hiaasen? (The Atlantic gift link)
    If you have never read Carl Hiaasen, start with Skinny Dip and then move on to Basket Case. Or just pick up whichever title you find at your public library. You can thank me later.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome to the next phase of Living in a Media World

Marquee for The World Theatre with Ralph Hanson pictured. Text: HAPPY RETIREMENT RALPH HANSON, CASABLANCA, TUESDAY 700, FREE ADMISSION

On Tuesday, May 12, 2026, I’m celebrating my retirement from UNK by hosting a 7 p.m. showing of the movie Casablanca at The World Theatre here in Kearney. Everyone is invited.

So, it’s been awhile…

Posts here over the last year have been rather erratic as I’ve had a busy time finishing up my 38-year career as a journalism and communication professor. For the last 18 years I’ve been a teacher and administrator here at the University of Nebraska at Kearney. Before that, I worked for 15 years at West Virginia University and five-and-a-half years at Northern Arizona University. But as of last Friday, I’m now retired, at least from teaching at the university.

But that doesn’t mean my career is over. I’m now going to finally have time to write again on a scheduled basis, so you can expect to start seeing posts here much more frequently. Here is some of what I have planned going forward:

  • I will, as always, have details about the news in the mass communication industry. These posts will be the first drafts of the updates for the next edition of my textbook Mass Communication: Living in a Media World.
  • Talk about what I’m watching, reading, listening to, and playing. (Yes, more time for video games is definitely on my agenda.)
  • Back during the lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, I started a series discussing the more than 200 movies we watched at home while we were all cooped up.  But life interfered with the series, and it never got very far. I want to restart and complete it.
  • Examine some of the trends of how we interact with media.
  • Write about current events that don’t necessarily connect to media (though they almost always do…)
  • Write about my travels by motorcycle.

I already have a list of more than 20 blog posts I want to write about, ranging from examining whether your phone is listening to you to building a lightweight adventure touring motorcycle.

Feel free to comment to join in on the conversation!

Hope you all stick around.

Ralph

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SCOTUS declines to hear AI copyright case

The US Supreme Court today announced they were not going to hear a case claiming copyright protection for AI generated works.  The plaintiff wanted to have copyright go to the person running the AI software. The courts had previously ruled in the case that only works that were created by a human being were entitled to protection.

With this decision, it there is no protection for AI works. There are ways this could change in the future, but that’s how things stand for now.

This AI-designed image was created in 2012 using a tool called DABUS, developed by computer scientist Stephen Thaler. The artwork is the subject of a copyright battle that the US Supreme Court declined to hear. — Stephen Thaler/DABUS

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on SCOTUS declines to hear AI copyright case

A Video History of Rock ‘n’ Roll, Soul and Country Music

Thursday was one of my favorite media literacy lectures covering the history of a variety of formats of popular music, starting with hillbilly, folk, and the so-called race records.

We started out with Chuck Berry performing “You Can’t Catch Me” from the film Rock, Rock, Rock.


We then moved on to the British invasion with a 1965 clip (I believe) of The Who playing “The Kids Are Alright” in front of a lake. Like the Chuck Berry clip above, this is obviously a lip synch as there are no microphones or cables in either. But it’s a lot of fun seeing the boys in their early 20s working at being too cool for school.


Coming up next, we moved into the era of the concept albums such asThe Beatles “Sgt. Pepper,” Frank Zappa’s “Freak Out,” and, of course, The Beach Boys’ “Pet Sounds.” Rather than using a period clip of them playing “God Only Knows,” I went with this one from the launch of the BBC Music Service from 2014. It’s an amazing compilation featuring a Who’s Who of music from the last 50 years, including among so many others Dave Grohl, Sam Smith, Chris Martin, Elton John, Lorde, Florence Welch, Stevie Wonder, Brian May, Chrissie Hynde, and Pharrell Williams.

And because “God Only Knows is the greatest pop song ever, here’s a bonus video of the Beach Boys playing their classic hit back in 1966. (This clip is actually from a 16mm silent film synched up with the original recording.)


Most accounts on the history of hip hop place it’s birth at block parties and with mix tapes from the Bronx in the 1970s (including my textbook), but PBS’s music education series Sound Field shows that the roots of hip hops rhythms and rhymes can be dated back to the 1940s, and uses this example from the gospel group The Jubalaires performing “Preacher and the Bear” in style that sounds an awful lot like early rap.


I closed out my lecture with the great Rosanne Cash playing her tribute to country music radio “50,000 Watts” from her album “The River & the Thread.”


And finally… pre-class video was Robert Plant and his band from his album “Saving Grace” playing a Tiny Desk concert. He’s come a long ways from arena Led Zeppelin shows.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Video History of Rock ‘n’ Roll, Soul and Country Music

A Hollowed-Out Washington Post

Jeff Bezos as Time’s Man of the Year in 1999. Cover by Gregory Heisler

Approximately 13 years ago, Jeff Bezos was recruited by the Graham family to purchase The Washington Post for $250 million. Bezos, the founder of Amazon and one of the world’s wealthiest men, bought the paper as an individual, not as a part of Amazon. At the time he purchased the paper, it made up less than 1 percent of his net worth.

When he first bought it, Bezos’s ownership of the Post was seen as a positive thing. He had the deep pockets to invest in improving the newsroom, he had the tech knowledge to move the Post into the 21st century, and he was rich enough to not have to worry about how profitable the paper would be.

So how did that work out?

Opinions have varied over the last decade or so, but lately Bezos has gone from being a largely hands-off owner to a self-serving owner.


In April of 2019, I took a look at how the Bezos/WaPo relationship was doing, five-and-a-half years in. As might be expected, it was somewhat of a mixed bag.

  • Bezos moved The Post from being a paper “For and about Washington” to being one with a national or even global presence. This meant that the paper was no longer going to limit itself to news within its print circulation area. By 2016, the paper had a growing audience, improved reporting, and was gaining a reputation as a national news source.
  • Bezos was hiring both journalists and tech people.
  • The paper capitalized on the growing interest in Washington, D.C. news that came with the rise of Donald Trump as a politician.
  • Surprising very few people, Bezos had conflicts with the unions at The Post. Between 2013 and 2018, Bezos’s net worth had climbed from approximately $26 billion to $158 billion. Meanwhile, the Washington Post Guild negotiated a contract for a $15 a week pay raise for staffers. At the same time, Bezos’ net worth was increasing by something like $10.8 million an hour.
  • During this time, Bezos was also suffering from attacks by President Trump, for both the editorial policies of the Post (which at the time Bezos had reportedly little involvement) and for delivery contracts that Amazon had with the U.S. Postal Service.

I concluded this five year retrospective of Bezos’ time as Post owner by writing:

Bezos has been largely successful with his purchase of the Washington Post. Since acquiring it in 2013, he has improved readership, revenue and reporting at the paper. He has also worked at building it up as a national news source that is delivered primarily digitally. Like he did before with Amazon, Bezos is most concerned with investing in the future of the Washington Post than with short-term profits; more interested in reader engagement than revenue.

Overall, the newsroom is happy to have a forward thinking owner who has deep pockets investing in the long-term success of the paper, but the staff would like it better if Bezos were willing to share more of that revenue with them.

Ownership of the Washington Post has not always been an easy thing for Bezos, opening him up to attacks on himself and his businesses from both President Trump and his allies.


Jump forward another five years to 2024.

Donald Trump finished up his first term, failed to get re-elected in 2020, and was running once again for the presidency. The editorial staff of the Post had prepared an editorial endorsing the Harris/Walz ticket. But less than 24-hours before publishing the endorsement, Bezos killed the editorial. At the time I wrote:

The controversy exploding from this is not so much that the paper has discontinued endorsements at the presidential level as that it was done just 10 days before the intensely controversial 2024 presidential election. Criticism of the move by Bezos and [publisher William] Lewis to cancel the endorsement has been massive by the current and former staff of the Post, who see the move as being done out of fear that Bezos’ companies would be hurt should Trump win the presidency again. It has resulted in a number of resignations from the paper’s staff.  One of the most outspoken has been former editor Marty Baron.

This has also led to a massive number of people publicly cancelling their subscriptions to the Washington Post in hope of sending a message to the paper. I have argued on social media that nothing readers can do will hurt Bezos. But cancelling subscriptions can and will hurt the journalists and opinion writers at the paper, none of whom had anything to do with cancelling the endorsement. 

This was the beginning of Bezos working to seek the approval of the Trump administration, or at least avoid antagonizing it.  It also suggested that his commitment to the newspaper as a treasured journalism outlet was not all it could be.


Dave Karpf, associate professor of media and public affairs at George Washington University, writes that for first ten years of his ownership, “[Bezos] was about as good of a steward as you could hope for. He hired Marty Baron and left the journalists to be in charge of the actual journalism. When the paper lost money, he wrote a check.”

But then in early February Bezos fired 300 of the 800 journalists working at the Post. Yes, he fired more than a third of the staff.

As Karpf points out, it can’t just be about the money. Bezos’ personal net worth is now up to nearly $250 billion. That’s more than 10 times what it was in 2013. He’s not suffering for money.

Karpf suggests that these cuts are because Bezos has decided that he’s now on “Team Billionaire,” where he doesn’t want the Post doing anything that will screw up his other business interests:

Team Billionaire isn’t quite the same as Team Trump, but the two have made peace and found common cause with each other. Jeff Bezos knows that, if the Washington Post publishes the wrong story about the wrong person, it could spell trouble for Blue Origin or Amazon. Being a hands-off media mogul was fine when it didn’t cause any trouble. But under authoritarianism, it can be such a headache.


Joseph Weber, professor emeritus at the College of Journalism  and Mass Communication at the University of  Nebraska-Lincoln, recently wrote about Bezos’s change at his Substack, comparing how the New York Times was behaving compared to the Post. As career-long reader of the Post (I subscribed to their weekly edition back in the pre-internet days and for 15 years lived in the circulation area of their Sunday edition), I always saw it as superior to the Times, but that loyalty has faded. As Weber points out, the Times has more than 2,800 people working on journalism while the Post will now be down below 500. His analysis is well worth a read.

Former Wall Street Journal tech reporter and prominent podcaster Kara Swisher saw a solution to the Post’s problems back in 2024 when she said she was trying to put together a wealthy pool of investors to buy the paper from Bezos and turn it into a non-profit. Swisher said in March of 2025 that investor interest was not a problem, but Bezos did not want to sell the Post, he just wants to keep it on life support to do his bidding.


I promised myself when I started working on this post a couple of weeks ago that I would not close it out with a paraphrase of the famous quote from T.S. Elliot’s The Hollow Men, “This is the way the [Post] ends, not with a bang but a whimper.”

Bu I think perhaps an earlier line from the same poem might be more appropriate:

We are the hollow men 
We are the stuffed men 
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when 
We whisper together 
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Hollowed-Out Washington Post

Getting a taste of Hannah Goldfield’s food writing

Although I haven’t talked about it enough here over the years, I’m enthralled by thoughtful food writing – whether it’s the reviews of street food by Los Angeles’ Jonathan Gold, the profane visits round the world by Anthony Bourdain, the reviews of neighborhood restaurants and stories of food culture in the Washington, DC area by my friend Tim Carman, or the discussion of food life here on the prairie by Sarah Baker Hansen.  We all must eat; what we eat and why is a big part of who we are. And these writers, and so many others, help tell these stories beyond the communities where they originated.

My Dear Wife and I share a subscription to The New Yorker, where she generally reads it in the print magazine and I consume it on my tablet. But earlier this week she gave me several copies of the magazine opened up to food articles, all written by the New Yorker’s food writer Hannah Goldfield. They cover everything from the Minnesota State Fair’s unique food offerings (as a frequent visitor there, I can say they are amazing and sometimes deeply weird), to Indian pizza, to baking flour tortillas, to remembering the late, great Bourdain. Without further ado other than a bon appetite, here is some great food writing for your weekend.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Getting a taste of Hannah Goldfield’s food writing

TikTok is finally legal again in the US

TikTok logoTikTok has finalized a joint venture to have cloud-computing giant Oracle (along with a range of international partners) run its US operations. This finally brings the company into compliance with a law passed and signed into law in 2024 that banned the social media video sharing company from operating in the US while it was being owned by the Chinese company ByteDance.  But though the law has been in effect for more than a year, the Trump administration had declined to enforce it, despite having been a vocal proponent of  the then-proposed law during President Trump’s first term.

According to the Wall Street Journalinvestors are paying the U.S. government a “multibillion-dollar fee for arranging the deal.”  According to NPR back in September, some experts are calling this a “fee,” while others call it a “shakedown.”

The new owners include Oracle, with a 15 percent stake in the American branch of the company. Oracle is run by Larry Ellison, one of the world’s richest men and a close friend of President Trump. His son David recently purchased the Paramount movie studio.

TikTok has more than 200 million US users. The concern had been that the Chinese government was using the video sharing service to collect data on people in the US and around the world.

The president apparently switched from being a critic of TikTok to being a supporter because he said it helped him win his second term.


In other TikTok news:

  • A personal injury lawsuit against the social media giant opened this week in California with a young woman claiming that social media companies have “built products that fostered addiction in adolescents and caused her a host of mental-health problems.” If the suit determines that TikTok is liable for harms to the young woman, it could have extensive fallout for other social media services, including Meta Platforms, Snap, and YouTube.
  • TikTok has changed its terms of services, but according to Mashable, it’s basically the same crappy kind of TOS agreement that social media services have always had. When the change in ownership discussed above happened, the company made users accept a new TOS. Mashable’s Chase DiBenedetto writes that while there have been updates, they are not massive changes. But as DiBenedetto suggests, this is probably a good time for you to read through the updated contract you’ve just signed off on.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on TikTok is finally legal again in the US