Thoughts on closing out the ninth edition of Mass Communication

Ralph Hanson profile photo

Your Author

As I have been closing out work on the ninth edition of Mass Communication: Living in a Media World, it’s amazing to think back on how different things were back in the spring and summer 2020 when I was finishing up the eighth edition. We were still in the midst of the global pandemic lockdown and all the lasting effects the lockdown had on the media industry. Sports teams stopped playing, movies and television shows stopped being produced, theaters were closed, music was being recorded at home or through complex online links, and everyone was just staying home to consume their media.

Now, four years later, we are dealing with the aftermath of how the media industry and media consumers have emerged from that time.

  • Young, and not-so-young, folks are busy engaging with all-things Taylor Swift. It seems impossible to listen to music, watch television, go on social media, watch football… without encountering the megastar.
  •  The movie industry is trying to figure out how to bring people back into theaters in great enough numbers to keep cinemas open. Coming in on top of all the holdups from the pandemic and people getting used to viewing at home, movies (and television) are dealing with the aftermath of lengthy writers’ and actors’ strikes over the last year.
  • American culture is also dealing with a lot of new or revived fears about the media. There have been unprecedented efforts to ban books about race and sexuality from libraries and public schools, and parents are worrying about how social media are affecting teens, especially young women.
  • There are intense concerns as to whether the local news industry can survive steep decline in community newspapers.

And yet, through all of this there are new voices being heard through streaming services and other long-tail media. Independent bookstores are finding fresh relevance as people turn to people, rather than algorithms, for advice on what to read, and millions of people are discovering the joy of the minimally produced NPR Tiny Desk concerts on YouTube.

The COVID-19 pandemic may not be over, but both the media industry and media consumers are trying to find their way to a new normal, and that’s what this ninth edition of Mass Communication: Living in a Media World is going to explore. Thirteen of the chapters have new opening vignettes, highlighting many of the changes that have happened in the media world. All of the chapters have been substantially updated with both new statistics and examples.

As is usually the case when I’m finishing up revisions, the blog has been neglected, but I’m planning on trying to talk here about a lot of the new material coming up in the ninth edition.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Thoughts on closing out the ninth edition of Mass Communication

Conflicts between newsroom and management at Washington Post

NOTE: Sorry for the recent lack of posts. I’ve been writing away on the ninth edition of Mass Communication, Living in a Media World that comes out in 2025. Expect to see posts based on some of that material as the summer progresses. In the mean time, here’s a brief look at the recent dust-up at the Washington Post.


One of the central concerns in journalism is having a separation between the newsroom and management. The business side of the newspaper/news outlet should not be interfering with individual story choices in the newsroom. One of the concerns when Jeff Bezos purchased the Washington Post back in 2013 was that he would interfere with the paper’s coverage of his business empire. For the most part, that fear has not been realized. While he has held a hard line with unions, Bezos has, for the most part, let the paper work independent of his influence. Bezos has also been good, in the past, about providing support for good journalism.

The same cannot be said, apparently, for Washington Post CEO and publisher Will Lewis. According to multiple reports, he forced out Post executive editor Sally Buzbee for her work with the paper’s reporting on a phone hacking scandal at British newspapers owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. Lewis was being mentioned in a British court case over the scandal as an executive who might have been involved with efforts to hide the evidence of the hacking at the newspapers.

NPR’s media reporter David Folkenflik also reported this week on how Lewis tried to seta up a quid pro quo to give Folkenflik an exclusive about reorganization at the Post’s newsroom in return for Folkenflik dropping work on a story about “widespread criminal practices at media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s British tabloids.”

Screenshot

Lewis has denied doing any of these things.

As of this writing, Buzbee has not commented on her sudden departure.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Conflicts between newsroom and management at Washington Post

Video Game Examples

 


Atari Pong – First Commercial Video Game?


Mario over the years


Tomb Raider – Girl Power or Male Gaze?


Using Final Fantasy to Create Machinima animation

Mortal Kombat Fatality


Grayson the Fish Playing Pokemon


Presidential Candidate Herman Cain Quotes Pokemon Song

Herman Cain Pokemon Video

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Video Game Examples

Everyone’s Gone To The Movies: 2024 Oscars Edition

Some thought’s from last night’s Oscar broadcast.

  • People often tell me I see connections between movies that no one else does. For example I think that Rober Zemeckis’ Contact and Ridley Scott’s Prometheus tell thematically similar stories. And I have argued at length that Star Wars Episode 2: Attack of the Clones is essentially an extended tribute to the early films of Ridley Scott. For the record, I know I’m right on Episode 2, and I think I have a strong argument on Prometheus. This year after seeing the brilliant and disturbing Poor Things, I saw connections between it and last year’s Best Picture nominee Triangle of Sadness. Both deal with the conflicts between economic and social classes, and how women can acquire both social and sexual power. Both also have highly disturbing scenes in which the power dynamic changes suddenly. After watching last night’s Oscar telecast, I also realized that Poor Things Bella Baxter (played by Oscar winner Emma Stone) has a lot in common with Margo Robbie’s Barbie. Both characters become gradually aware of deep issues about their existence as they move from being little more than a toy into fully realized human beings. They also both have to come to terms with themselves as sexual beingsWhat do you think?

    Margot Robbie from Barbie, Emma Stone from Poor Things, and Dolly de Leon from Triangle of Sadness.

    Margot Robbie from Barbie, Emma Stone from Poor Things, and Dolly de Leon from Triangle of Sadness.

  • Like my Dear Wife and college friend Rich Ness, I wonder why the Academy had an elaborate interpretive dance number going on during the In Memoriam segment. It was almost as if the producers didn’t trust the audience to care enough about cinematic history to stay tuned in. The presentation on TV actually made it hard to see who was being remembered. To me, this is one of the best segments of the show. Fill the screen with names and images.

https://youtu.be/sM_JK8h42BA?si=m28RwWCqLQwT1C5l

  • I’m a big fan of short films. And while I do not doubt for a minute that Wes Anderson made a brilliant series of short films for Netflix, I really didn’t like him taking home the Oscar. Not because his short lacked merit. I just think that shorts are place for filmmakers just entering into the industry to have a chance to make their mark. Of course an iconic director with access to a top notch crew and a strong budget can make a winning film.But that’s not really the question. I felt the same way when Kobe Bryant’s Dear Basketball, an animated short I adore, won. I mean how is an indie animator supposed to compete with a film directed and animated by Disney legend Glen Keane and scored by John Williams.

  • It’s ok to give an Oscar for Best Song to a tune that is fun and makes you want to sing along. This is no slight to Billy Ellish and her brother Foinneas O’Connell who have won two Best Song trophies for relatively downbeat songs in 2021 and 2023. But if you think about which song defined the summer hit Barbie, it was Ryan Gosling’s I’m Just Ken that had everyone talking, not Elish’s What Was I Made For.  I thought Disney botched it back in 2021 when they nominated Dos Oruguitas from Encanto rather than We Don’t Talk About Bruno that both charted and was on every child’s lips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmG0983hPUs

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Everyone’s Gone To The Movies: 2024 Oscars Edition

Interesting Columnists – 2024

Do you have someone you think I should add here? Send me a note and I’ll add them to a future post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Interesting Columnists – 2024

What happens when a library burns? Depends on what the books are made of

Covers of books about the history of books and libraries.How big of a book nerd am I? While researching book history this morning, I pulled these three volumes out of my personal library. Here’s some of what I found:


Canadian railroad economist Harold Innis wrote one of the most interesting books about the nature of media – Empire and Communications. In it, he argued that any given medium has a bias of lasting a long time or of being easy to distribute. In the ancient world, clay and stone would be durable media biased toward the concept of time, while papyrus and parchment writings were easy to distribute and thus biased toward space.

How well these writing surfaces preserve their documents is fascinating. Lionel Casson, writing in Libraries in the Ancient World, notes that if you burn a library full of papyrus or parchment, the documents all are reduced to ashes, but if the documents are inscribed onto clay tablets, a massive fire would bake the pages into a more permanent form – fired clay.(9e0877) Clay tablets also had the advantage of being inexpensive and easy to produce. They had the disadvantage, of course, of being heavy, bulky, and difficult to transport.

The Sumerian angular cuneiform writing style also worked well with being cut into soft clay. These date back to the third millennium BCE. And their survivability is part of the reason that so much of our early history of writing comes from clay tablets.

Among the most spectacular early documents was a collection of several thousand tablets that had been in a burned room in Syria, dating back to approximately 2300 BCE. While most of these tablets were inventories and business records, there were also tablets that were bilingual word lists, and a pair of tablets contained a copy of a Sumerian myth. Casson says that this was likely a palace scribe’s library.

The most famous of the ancient libraries was the one in Alexandria, Egypt, founded in about 300 BCE. Created by Aristotle, it had books on virtually every topic and was open to the public. At its peak, the library contained more than 490,000 scrolls, some of which contained multiple books or documents, and some of which were duplicates. A popular, but likely incorrect, story says the library burned in 48 BCE, but there is substantial evidence that at least a large part of the library lasted until 270 AD when heavy fighting in Alexandria burned much of the city, likely including the library.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on What happens when a library burns? Depends on what the books are made of

How Do Social Media Affect Young People?

Frances Haugen was a Facebook product manager whose job was to protect against election interference on the social media site. She worked at the company for nearly two years, departing in May of 2021. During her time at the social media company now known as Meta, she became disillusioned with her work, believing that Facebook was more concerned about “growth and user engagement” than about making sure the web site was a healthy place for people to go to for information.

Before working for Facebook, she had put in time working for Google and social media channel Pinterest. During this time she also had a close friend who radically changed his personality and beliefs after spending large amounts of time online reading material on forums about white nationalism and the occult. This experience made he start questioning how social media might affect young people.

“It’s one thing to study misinformation, it’s another to lose someone to it,” she said. “A lot of people who work on these products only see the positive side of things.”

During her last several months at Facebook, she dug through a large archive of company research and reports that were posted openly to the company’s intranet Facebook Workplace. These documents were the basis of a series of stories published in the Wall Street Journal that argue:

  • Facebook’s rules favor powerful elites, with the usual rules being ignored when it comes to powerful politicians and celebs.
  • The channel’s algorithms promote conflict by promoting engagement instead of reliable information.
  • Their services are used openly by bad actors such as drug cartels and human traffickers.
  • Instagram can have negative effects on vulnerable girls’ mental health.

Haugen eventually leaked six documents about internal research on the effects of Meta’s social media sites that were published about in a series of stories by the Wall Street Journal known as “The Facebook Files.

One of the biggest offenders, according to the Facebook Files, was photo-sharing service Instagram. The company’s own work showed that spending time on Instagram made body image worse for at least one-third of teen girl users. Closely connected were reports that Instagram posts focused heavily on “body image and lifestyle” and that they fostered excessive social comparison.

The Journal found that these negative social media effects tended to be connected specifically to Instagram:

“That is especially true concerning so-called social comparison, which is when people assess their own value in relation to the attractiveness, wealth, and success of others. The tendency to share only the best moments, a pressure to look perfect, and an addictive product can send teens spiraling toward eating disorders, an unhealthy sense of their own bodies, and depression, March 2020 internal [Meta] research states.” 

In response to criticism of how Instagram has engaged with teens and pre-teens, Meta has urged young people to have private accounts and is working at controlling which ads will be shown to them. The company has also said it is working on developing a new product for users under age 13, though as of this writing in the winter of 2024, Meta had only announced new controls on existing products.

The publication of the so-called Facebook Files led to congressional hearings, multiple states suing social media companies, and New York City declaring social media to be a public health hazard because of its effects on young people’s mental health.


According to a study by the Pew Research Center, parents have a wide range of concerns about potential negative effects of social media on teens that may or may not be supported by actual research:

• Being exposed to explicit content
• Wasting too much time on the sites
• Being distracted from completing homework
• Sharing too much about their personal life
• Feeling pressured to act in a certain way
• Being harassed or bullied
• Experiencing problems with anxiety, depression, or lower self-esteem

Parents of girls expressed more concern about problems with anxiety, depression and lower self-esteem than did parents of boys.

Research on social media concerns by parents from the Pew Research Center.


In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General’s office published an advisory report on “Social Media and Youth Mental Health.” This report looks at both the negative and positive outcomes that might come from young people’s use of social media. In the study the Surgeon General’s office reviewed a wide range of studies, trying to put together a summary of what we know about the subject, as opposed to what teens, parents and politicians think they know.

Overall, the report found that social media is a near universal experience for teens, with nearly 95 percent of those 13-17 reporting using a social media platform. And while children under 13 are supposedly not allowed on social media, research shows that nearly 40 percent of those ages 8-12 use social media.

One clear finding of the study was that while social media may have a variety of effects on young people, “different children and adolescents are affected by social media in different ways, based on their individual strengths and vulnerabilities, and based on cultural, historical, and socio-economic factors.” (In fact, this statement could be applied to virtually all mass communication research every conducted.)

The Surgeon General’s report found that there are potential benefits to youth from using social media including providing connections with people who share similar interests and creating a place for self-expression. Social media can also give young people a chance to interact with a more diverse peer group than they would have access to otherwise. As an example, a 20-year-old Stanford University student said that she liked being able to follow other young women who use wheelchairs on Instagram, which was a positive influence for her.

On the negative side, the report found that adolescents who spent more than three hours per day on social media had double the risk of experiencing symptoms of such as depression and anxiety. One study reviewed in the report found that limiting social media exposure to 30 minutes a day led to “significant improvements in depression severity.”  The report also found support for concerns that social media content could help promote “body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, and depressive symptoms.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on How Do Social Media Affect Young People?

Ten Accounts I Follow on Threads

This week my JMC 406 Blogging and Commentary students were asked to do one of their first posts by listing 10 Threads accounts they are following and why. You can find my students’ posts using the #JMC406 hashtag. Here’s my swing at the assignment. I’m trying to avoid accounts my students are likely linking to:

  1. postopinions – From the Op/Ed pages of the WaPo
    Sharing a  range of editorials and opinion pieces from the Washington Post.
  2. dkiesow – Damon Kiesow
    Knight Chair in Journalism at Mizzou. Smart commentary on journalism and media business.
  3. grovesprof – Jonathan Groves
    Professor at Drury University and former journalist
  4. jeremyhl – Jeremy Harris Lipschultz
    Social media and journalism professor at UNO, Cubs fan, and media law commentator.
  5. karaswisher – Kara Swisher
    Journalist at the intersection of tech/politics/culture.
  6. oliverdarcy – Oliver Darcy
    Senior media reporter for CNN, produces the…
  7. cnnreliablesources feed.
    For years was the CNN weekly news media show. Now a newsletter.
  8. davidfrenchjag – David French
    Conservative, evangelical columnist for NY Times. Lawyer, veteran.
  9. thebadastronomer – Phil Plait
    Writes about astronomy and other science issues. Has been a speaker on the UNK campus on several occasions.
  10. sixuntilme – Kerri Sparling
    Kerri has been writing about living for diabetes for something like 20 years. She was one of the earliest diabetes bloggers. By the way, she is married to screenwriter Chris Sparling, who wrote the terrifying movie Buried staring Ryan Reynolds.
  11. rosannecash – Rosanne Cash
    Daughter of Johnny, one of my favorite musicians, fantastic performer
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Ten Accounts I Follow on Threads

Gerwig can’t overcome double whammy of directing a female-centric comedy

Gerwig (left) and Robbie, pictured at the Golden Globes, missed out on best director and best actress respectively. Click photo to go to BBC story. Getty Images

Greta Gerwig has directed three films since 2017, including Lady Bird, Little Women and the monster hit Barbie. All three were well regarded with multiple Academy Award nominations – but only the indie Lady Bird managed to score her a Best Director nomination. Now, I have no great insight into the Oscar nomination process, and I certainly haven’t seen all of the nominated films. But I take it as strange that a woman who has done so much with three films about women can’t get nominated for anything other than her small, indie movie.

Back in 2020, when Gerwig’s creative retelling of Little Women was in the running, I wrote:

I thought Little Women was one of the most enjoyable and interesting movies I saw all year.  And I say this as someone who had never read Little Women, nor did I know its most famous plot point. While much of the acting in it was spot on (especially from Florence Pugh who plays the difficult sister, Amy), this is clearly a film that belongs to director/screenwriter Greta Gerwig.  She got a well deserved best adapted screenplay nomination, but no nod for best director. She tells the story assuredly with a current and historic timeline that brought a new storytelling convention to a 150-year-old story.

But in 2020, and almost every other year, it took making a manly film about manly things to get Academy love, unless you are an indie or international film that makes no threat to the established order. I’m not even arguing that Gerwig should with the Oscar – I’m both predicting and rooting for Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer. But the fact that the director of a groundbreaking musical comedy that plays with lots of complex ideas and still makes a giant bucket of money can’t even get a spot on the ballot seems nuts.

Best director:

  • Anatomy of a Fall – Justine Triet
  • Killers of the Flower Moon – Martin Scorsese
  • Oppenheimer – Christopher Nolan
  • Poor Things – Yorgos Lanthimos
  • The Zone of Interest – Jonathan Glazer

Beyond best director, here are my thoughts on some of the rest of the nominations:

Best Picture:

  • American Fiction
  • Anatomy of a Fall
  • Barbie
  • The Holdovers
  • Killers of the Flower Moon
  • Maestro
  • Oppenheimer
  • Past Lives
  • Poor Things
  • The Zone of Interest

No real complaints, though I think that it was arguable that Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse could have deserved a slot here.


Best actor:

  • Bradley Cooper – Maestro
  • Colman Domingo – Rustin
  • Paul Giamatti – The Holdovers
  • Cillian Murphy – Oppenheimer
  • Jeffrey Wright – American Fiction

I would be amazed if it went to anyone other than Murphy, though I admire Giamatti’s and Cooper’s performances.


Best actress:

  • Annette Bening – Nyad
  • Lily Gladstone – Killers of the Flower Moon
  • Sandra Huller – Anatomy of a Fall
  • Carey Mulligan – Maestro
  • Emma Stone – Poor Things

No love here for Barbie’s Margot Robbie, who did a great job of bringing a doll to life in a critique of the patriarchy, seems … odd.


Best supporting actress:

  • Emily Blunt – Oppenheimer
  • Danielle Brooks – The Color Purple
  • America Ferrera – Barbie
  • Jodie Foster – Nyad
  • Da’Vine Joy Randolph – The Holdovers

Thought Randolph’s performance as the grieving mother in The Holdovers was exceptional. I’m also pleased to see America Ferrara getting recognition for Barbie.


Best supporting actor:

  • Sterling K Brown – American Fiction
  • Robert De Niro – Killers of the Flower Moon
  • Robert Downey Jr – Oppenheimer
  • Ryan Gosling – Barbie
  • Mark Ruffalo – Poor Things

I really want to see Robert Downey Jr. get this for playing Oppenheimer antagonist Lewis Strauss. Ryan Gosling was excellent in Barbie, but how he got a nom when Robbie got passed by is beyond me. (Yes, I know, different categories, etc., but really?)


Best animated feature:

  • The Boy and the Heron
  • Elemental
  • Nimona
  • Robot Dreams
  • Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

I won’t get to see The Boy and the Heron for several more weeks, but I have no doubt that it is worthy of it’s spot on the list. I am so happy that Netflix and Annapurna Pictures managed to complete the queer-themed Nimona after Disney dropped it, and I’m delighted to see it with a nomination. (I had it on my top 10 list for 2023.) I was not impressed with Disney/Pixar’s Elemental, and I would have prefered to have seen the anime Suzume or the stylish Teen-Aged Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem in its place.  I assume Spider-Verse will win, and I have no complaint with that.


What did you think about this year’s nominations? Leave your thoughts in the comments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gerwig can’t overcome double whammy of directing a female-centric comedy

When Unions Dominate News Over Media Conglomerates

Usually when we talk about the media business we are talking about the actions of corporate giants like Disney and Paramount, but in the summer of 2023, it was the actions of the movie and television writers and actors unions that were making the news.

In mid-July, SAG-AFTRA members joined striking screenwriters on the picket lines outside Hollywood studios and streaming companies.
Mandalit del Barco/NPR News

For the first time since 1960 both the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) and the Writers Guild of America (WGA) were on strike at the same time against the Hollywood studios shutting down virtually all production and promotion of scripted movies and TV shows.

In the 1960 strike, the Screen Actors Guild was led by Ronald Reagan, who would go on to become the only union president to become president of the United States.  According to entertainment news magazine Variety:

In that strike, both the writers and actors were wrestling with compensation issues arising from the dawn of television. Together, they won residuals for TV reruns and for broadcast of films on TV and established the first pension and welfare plan.

A lot changed over the 60 years since the last double strike. This time the unions were dealing with the decline of legacy linear television and the move to streaming and digital video — a transition at least as transformational as the rise of broadcast television in the 1950s and 60s. They were also concerned about how artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to capture actors’ images and voices and turn them into on-screen performances without additional involvement by the actors.

Until the rise of streaming services, actors and writers could count on getting paid when a show or movie was initially created and screened or broadcast. They would then receive residual payments each time a show was aired on broadcast/cable TV as a syndicated rerun. (Think about how you might have watched old episodes of Friends, Seinfeld, or The Office in the afternoon on your local television station or on a cable channel such as TNT or TBS.)

For many writers and actors, there can be long gaps between big, successful projects, and the residuals are what help them pay the bills during those lean times. (Remember, for every high-paid star in Hollywood there are literally dozens of journeyman workers who are just hoping to make ends meet.)

For the 2023 strike, writers and actors had a number of new concerns:

  • They were calling for a bigger, better defined share of the income from streaming services such as Netflix, Disney+, Paramount Plus and Hulu. Given that’s where most viewing is moving, that’s where the people who work in the industry say they need to be getting more of their income.
  • Both writers and actors were worried about how studios might use artificial intelligence computer programs to write scripts or create photorealistic recreations of actors for movies or shows.
  • According to film and TV professor Andrew Susskind, TV shows traditionally have lasted 20-24 episodes a season, giving staff writers eight to 10 months of work per season. “And being around for all the episodes, it offers writers the opportunity to grow, because they’re there for script writing, they get to see preproduction, maybe get to see postproduction; so they get to learn production and maybe one day get to be producers or showrunners,” Susskind said.Now shows are more likely to have 10 or fewer episodes, and the writing staff will be smaller with more freelancers being brought in to work on just a single episode. This gives the writers employment of weeks rather than months.

These strikes, of course, delayed or canceled the production of a wide range of projects. The actors’ strike will also meant that the stars could not help promote  new movies or shows. The first of these to be hit was the Christopher Nolan summer blockbuster Oppenheimer, where stars Emily Blunt, Matt Damon, Cillian Murphy and Florence Pugh were only available for a single red-carpet appearance before the strike sent them to the picket lines.

The studios saw things a bit differently than the unions, stating that the strikes were coming at “the worst time in the world,” according to Disney head Bob Iger. Speaking to CNBC, Iger said:

“There’s a level of expectation that [the unions] have that is just not realistic. And they are adding to the set of the challenges that this business is already facing that is, quite frankly, very disruptive.”

Although studio executives made snarky anonymous claims in the Hollywood press that they would simply wait out the strike “until union members start losing their apartments and losing their houses,” in the end, the studios largely gave in to union demands. In separate contracts, both unions reached agreements for residuals for programming on streaming media, strict controls on how artificial intelligence can be used in producing content, and minimum staffing levels for writers’ rooms.

David Sims, culture writer for The Atlantic, argued that the reason the writers and actors could outlast the studios was that their financial situations were so bad they had nothing to lose by staying out on strike. The media companies, on the other hand, had nothing to put on screens or in theaters. As an example, over the Christmas holidays of 2023 my Dear Wife and I went to a local commercial theater to watch a re-release of Bruce Willis’ 1988 thriller Die Hard, which was showing because there simply weren’t enough new movies to fill the limited number of screens we have in our small, Midwestern town. These delays were particularly rough for the media giants that had been forced just three years earlier to delay large numbers of big movies because of theaters closed for the COVID pandemic.

With both writers and actors back on the job, the question is now what will the working relationship be between producers and creatives in Hollywood? Actor and SAG-AFTRA strike captain Chelsea Schwartz posed the question to NPR, “How do you go from being so angry at these people to being, like ‘and we’re best buds now, working together on set?’ We forgive, but you don’t forget.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on When Unions Dominate News Over Media Conglomerates