Brad Pitt’s “F1” adds to the pantheon of great racing movies

This weekend, our local community The World Theatre will be showing Brad Pitt’s Formula One racing movie “F1.” As always, tickets are just $5 with popcorn and soda each available from $1-$3. Bit of a bargain compared to the $3,000 “cheap seats” for the upcoming Circuit of the America’s race in Austin, Texas.


F1 tells the fictional story of former race great Sonny Hayes (Pitt) being recruited by old friend and struggling F1 team owner Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem) to try to bring the team a much needed victory. Hayes teams up with up-and-comer Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris) who has a lot of skill but no idea how to really race. Although it is clearly a testosterone-heavy film, it also has compelling female performances from Pearce’s mother, Bernadette (Sarah Niles, best known for stage and TV roles); and team technical director Kate McKenna (Kerry Condon, who brings her unabashed Irish regional accent that shone in the eminently weird and wonderful movie The Banshees of Inisherin).

Directed by Joseph Kosinski (Top Gun: Maverick), much of the movie was shot at actual F1 races in 2023 and 2024. While I’m not a car racing fan, I was for years a big motorcycle racing fan, and I was really impressed how the plot followed the importance of tire management and successful pit stops. While the producers did not have their own cars in the races, they were able to digitally “skin” two of the actual race cars with pseudo paint jobs to make them match Pitt’s and Idriss’ fictional cars. I know the movie has faced the inevitable criticism of Formula One fans for not being realistic, but honestly, I found it immensely enjoyable for characters, story and race drama.

I loved watching F1 in it’s initial run at our local commercial theater, and I can’t wait to see it again this weekend at The World.


Watching F1 brought to mind a number of older racing movies that I would love to find time to rewatch.


Most recently, that would be 2023’s Ferrari staring Adam Driver as Enzo Ferrari and Penélope Cruz as his estranged wife Laura Ferrari. Cruz is absolutely ferocious in this story based on the 1957 race season as Enzo tries to put together a team that can get a badly needed win in a 1,000-mile endurance race, and he struggles even harder, along with Laura, to come to terms with the death of their son Dino. While I thought Driver did well as Enzo, it was Cruz’s portrayal of the betrayed Laura who dominates the film.


The second variation on this theme was director James Mangold’s Ford v. Ferrari, which looks at the real-life 1966 battle between Ford and their new GT40 designed to compete against Ferrari in the 24 Hours of LeMans. The movie stars Matt Damon as the legendary driver and car designer Carroll Shelby and Christian Bale as Ken Miles, the English race car driver. As is always the case with movies based on real-life events, there is considerable fictionalization, but it’s still a great look at one of the great racing battles.


But as good as all three of these are, none are better than director Ron Howard’s Rush. Unlike these previous films, this is the story not of the cars but two rival drivers trying to establish who is better during the 1976 Formula One campaign. Chris Hemsworth (best known for as Marvel’s Thor) plays the passionate British playboy driver James Hunt, who drove for McLaren. German/Spanish actor Daniel Brühl (who became famous as the Marvel villain Helmut Zero) plays the cold, calculating Niki Lauda, an Austrian driver for Ferrari. This is not only a story about these drivers on the track but about how they approach their personal relationships and adversities.


Finally, we close this out by taking a big step back in time reminding you to take look at John Frankenheimer’s 1966 giant Grand Prix, staring James Garner, Eva Marie Saint, and cinematographer  Lionel Lindon’s gorgeous Super Panavision 70mm camerawork. It is a typical 1960s “epic film,” with an international cast and an almost 3-hour run time.


Epilogue – If you are a hard core racing fan, you might want to see Steve McQueen’s Le Mans, which tells the story of a fictional 1970 24 Hours of Le Mans endurance race. The film has virtually no plot with few meaningful characters, but it has some of the best race footage ever to appear in a dramatic movie.


Do you have a favorite racing movie of any type you’d like to mention? Tell us about it in the comments!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Brad Pitt’s “F1” adds to the pantheon of great racing movies

Everyone’s Gone to the Movies – Original Star Wars Edition

Editor’s Note: We’re going to have two or three summer movie blog posts coming up in the next week. For this one we’re looking at a rare screening of the original non-special-edition Star Wars.

Original Star Wars Trailer image

Click to play the original 1977 theatrical Star Wars trailer.

Original 1977 print of Star Wars screened in Britain
Back in the summer of 1977 I was 17 years old and was blown away by a new movie called Star Wars. I was so blown away by it I went to see it in the theater every weekend all summer long for a total of 13 times. I know that sounds excessive, but this was before streaming, before common availability of cable movie channels, before even the VCR. If you wanted to see a movie, you had to see it in person in the theater. So I don’t really think I was that over the top…

One of the things I noticed over the summer was how the 35mm print gradually deteriorated. New scratches would appear and bits of the film would disappear as the film broke repeatedly. At my local theater, the most notable change was that the sequence with the mouse robot kept getting shorter and shorter as the film kept breaking at the same spot.

Now, with digital prints, projecting a movie on the 100th screening looks exactly like the projection from opening night.

Except…

Star Wars director and producer George Lucas has never been able to leave his movies alone. In between the 1977 release of Star Wars and the 1980 release of The Empire Strikes Back, the original Star Wars acquired a new heading: Before the crawl, it was now Star Wars: Episode IV, A New Hope.

Then, in 1997, for the movie’s 20th anniversary, Lucas released new “Special Editions” of the original three movies with new digital effects and some controversial editorial changes – most notably changing things so “Han didn’t shoot first” in his confrontation with Greedo.

Han shoots first at Greedo in the 1977 version of Star Wars.

Ever since that time, Star Wars purists (your author included) have been begging to be able to see trilogy in all of its original analog effects glory. But Lucas not only stands thoroughly behind the Special Editions (he says they were how he always intended the movies to look), he also claims the original editions no longer exist.

That’s mostly true, though not entirely. I have a DVD set of the Special Edition original trilogy that includes the (mostly) original versions as bonus disks. But… these are very old school with non-anamorphic prints that have the black bars permanently baked in. This means that if you try to view it on your modern HDTV, you will have a very small image in the middle of your screen surrounded by the black bars, rendering it essentially unwatchable. The only way I’ve been able acceptably view these is by taking rips of them and viewing them on my iPad.

There is also a “de-specialized” version of the movie floating around online that have been assembled from a number of sources, reportedly including “2011 special edition Blu-rays, the 2006 bonus DVD, a 2004 HDTV telecast, a scan of an old 35-millimeter print, and a handful of other sources.”

But in June this summer some 900 fans got to see Star Wars just the way I did when I first saw it in the summer of 1977.  The British Film Institute  pulled their original dye transfer Technicolor 35 mm print for two plays at their Film on Film Festival.

As reported by NPR:

“We’re not saying come and see this on a film print as part of nostalgia,” said James Bell, a senior curator of fiction at the British Film Institute National Archive and the programming director of the festival. “We’re saying there’s a real qualitative, aesthetic difference to seeing a film projected on a film print. I think that’s exciting to anyone, whether you’re a Star Wars fan or not.”

In an interesting side note, Kathleen Kennedy, Lucasfilm’s president, attended the screening and held a conversation with BFI’s host. One can only hope that someday Lucasfilm will see fit to release a high-quality home video version of the original trilogy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Media giants doing the come together/separation dance

Where have I been?
Busy end of the semester and then a fair bit of traveling with family and on the motorcycle. Still have a fair amount of travel coming up, but will try to keep up better here.

Warner Bros. Discovery following in the footsteps of News Corp./Fox and Viacom/CBS

Dancing the minuetMedia companies seem to be fond of dancing a minuet of coming together and then separating recently.

Back in the summer of 2012, Rupert Murdoch announced he was splitting News Corporation and 20th Century Fox into two separate companies, primarily so that their stocks could trade separately – with News Corp. being devoted to books, newspapers, and database publishing; and Fox being devoted to entertainment programing (including, oddly enough, Fox News).

Viacom and CBS went a similar route early in the century, dancing back and forth before ending up together under the Paramount banner.They are currently dancing in circles trying to work out the merger of Paramount and Skydance Media sometime in 2025.

So now it’s the turn of Warner Bros. Discovery, a relatively recent creation when Discovery Inc. purchased WarnerMedia to strengthen their streaming portfolio, to become two separately traded companies. According to Variety:

The streaming company will encompass the Warner TV and movie studios, HBO and HBO Max and a games and experiences division. The company will focus on building out the HBO Max streaming service and investing in programming. Meanwhile, the TV company will include Warner’s TV networks around the world along with specific digital brands tied to the TV entities, including Discovery+, Bleacher Report and CNN’s new streaming products.

Media giant Comcast is also headed in the same direction before long. According to CNBC, it will be splitting into a streaming/cable company called Versant (as in short for conversant) that would include USA, CNBC, MSNBC, Oxygen, E!, SYFY and Golf Channel as well as the movie web sitesFandango and Rotten Tomatoes. Comcast will then contain the NBC broadcast network, Peacock streaming service, Universal Studios, the theme parks and Bravo.

All this talk of dancing gets me thinking of the folks on Bridgerton cavorting to the sounds of the Vitamin String Quartet.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Media giants doing the come together/separation dance

Free Speech and High School Students – Who Controls What Gets Printed?

Marcus Pennell, left, and Emma Smith — former Viking Saga newspaper staffers — outside Northwest High School in Grand Island, Neb., July 20. (McKenna Lamoree/The Independent via AP)

It’s never good for a high school when a reporter or editor of the school paper is writing a commentary for the Washington Post. Generally, when that happens, the school administration or school board has come down hard with some form of censorship on the student newspaper. That’s what happened in Grand Island, Nebraska, in June 2022.

Northwest High School’s Viking Saga had a pretty conventional cover, with a lead story about four siblings who had moved through a range of foster care but were now getting adopted into one family. Other stories on the cover told the story of a student whose sculpture was honored in a national competition, the appeal of trapshooting as a competitive sport, and the success of the school’s Future Business Leaders of America group. But what caught the attention of the school’s administration and the school board were a collection of articles dealing with LGBTQ+ issues, including a history of Pride Month under the headline “Pride and Prejudice: LGBTQIA+” written by associate editor Emma Smith, a commentary on the science of gender by staff writer Hiapatia McIntosh, and an editorial on Florida’s controversial “Don’t Say Gay” bill written by trans staff writer Marcus Pennell.

Only Marcus’s article was under the name “Meghan Pennell,” the name Marcus had been born with. A month or so before the paper was shut down and the newspaper journalism class canceled, the staff had been reprimanded after publishing preferred pronouns and names for bylines and in articles. District officials told students they could use only birth names from that point on.

The Washington Post helped bring national attention to the newspaper’s shutdown, or “cancellation” as some of the students referred to it, when it published a commentary by Pennell. Following his graduation, Pennell wrote:

The trouble started when I changed five letters in my first name.

My birth certificate reads “Meghan.” But my peers at Northwest High School in Nebraska knew me as “Marcus.” Changing my name wasn’t supposed to be a political statement. But our local school board has turned it into one…. Whether the administra- tion, parents or other students liked it or not, there were LGBTQ kids at Northwest, and taking away our liberty to be ourselves wasn’t going to change that.

Officially, the school district’s administration declined to say why or how the newspaper was shut down, but an email from a school employee to the Grand Island Independent local newspaper said it was “because the school board and superintendent are unhappy with the last issue’s editorial content.” The school board vice president had been previously quoted as saying, “I do think there have been talks of doing away with our newspaper if we were not going to be able to control con- tent that we saw (as) inappropriate.”

This all raises the question: Can the school district legally do this? Can it shut down a long-running, award-winning newspaper and cancel the newspaper curriculum just because it doesn’t like the paper writing about queer issues? In Nebraska, the answer was mostly “yes,” even if the district in the long run had a hard time making the cancellation stick. In principle, high school students do have free speech rights, but if a student newspaper is produced as part of a class activity, the school can control its content for any “legitimate education reason,” under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier decision that ruled that high school newspapers have only minimal protection under the First Amendment. And unlike some nearby states like Iowa and Kansas, Nebraska has not passed a law protecting the free speech rights of student publications.

After enrolling as a journalism major at the University of Nebraska Omaha, Pennell, along with the Nebraska High School Press Association, with help from the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, sued Grand Island Northwest Public Schools and its superintendent in federal district court, claiming that the district had violated Pennell’s First Amendment rights. The case was eventually dismissed by the judge because Pennell was no longer a student at the high school, but he noted, “School administrators would be wise to remember that policies and decisions to restrict speech in student newspapers … may run afoul of the First Amendment if they reflect ‘an effort to suppress expression merely because the public officials oppose a speaker’s view.’”

As for the student newspaper Viking Saga, it returned in the spring of 2023 as an online publication with a new faculty adviser, along with the class for producing it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Free Speech and High School Students – Who Controls What Gets Printed?

How “Death of a Unicorn” connects with reality

So there is a strange, violent, bloody, incredibly funny movie out this spring called Death of a Unicorn starring Paul Rudd, Jenna Ortega, Téa Leoni, and Richard E. Grant. Dear Wife and I saw it Thursday evening at The World Theatre, our local non-profit, volunteer-run community movie theatre.(Playing also Friday night and Sunday afternoon  – Full disclosure, I’m a regular volunteer there.)

On our way home from this oddball film, it occurred to me that I had already known quite a bit of its backstory from an article I thought I had read in the New Yorker maybe 10 years ago that might have been written by science and thriller writer Douglas Preston.

I was sorta close – It was almost exactly 20 years ago and the article was written by Doug’s brother, Richard Preston. Capturing the Unicorn tells the story of a collection of seven tapestries known as “The Hunt for the Unicorn” that hang in the Cloisters annex of the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art. They were created for unknown purposes in approximately 1500, most likely in Brussels or Liège, and are commonly considered to be both the greatest tapestries of all time and some of the greatest art of the Middle Ages.


There are a host of theories about why they were made and by whom.  A night guard at the Cloisters spent a lifetime of work observing the tapestries and attempting to derive the meaning from them. Art historians question the guard’s unconventional interpretations of them, but then again they haven’t spent decades living in direct proximity of them, either. JSTOR Daily discusses much of the imagery in these multicolored hangings enhanced with sliver and gold thread, but I will leave it to you, Dear Reader, to investigate.

Here are images of three of them from the Met’s web site:

The Unicorn Purifies Water – from the Unicorn Tapestries at The Met. Click on image for more information.

The Unicorn Defends Himself – from the Unicorn Tapestries at The Met. Click on image for more information.

The Unicorn Rests in the Garden – from the Unicorn Tapestries at The Met. Click on image for more information.


These tapestries have inspired a great deal of modern storytelling about unicorns, including animation in the opening sequence of the film The Last Unicorn.

They also showed up as inspiration for the art in my favorite graphic novel, Darwin Carmichael is Going to Hell, by Sophie Goldstein and Jenn Jordan. The scene below is taken from a sequence about Darwin visiting a unicorn park in New York City.

Scene from the graphic novel Darwin Carmichael is Going to Hell, by Sophie Goldstein and Jenn Jordan. For those who are wondering, Yes, Butter’s the Unicorn is a shout-out to Kate Beaton’s Fat Pony.


SPOILER ALERT – From here on out we will be discussing plot points from the movie Death of a Unicorn.


So after those digressions, let’s get back to the subject at hand.

Death of a Unicorn starts with the premise that these tapestries were something more than art, something more than guidance to young French aristocrats, something more than art designed to torment art curators centuries after their creation. Suppose that they portrayed a previous time when unicorns and humans really interacted with each other, where unicorns had magical powers and loved virgins who were pure of heart.

Suppose then also that these unicorns were hiding out in the present day in the mountains of British Columbia and that their blood was a cure for all that ailed humans….

That’s the story writer/director Alex Scharfman tells in his horror/comedy film from the trendy A24 studio (which brought us both Everything, Everywhere, All At Once and The Brutalist).  The film is full of standard movie tropes – the evil pharmaceutical exec; his self-absorbed, selfish family; the neglectful father and his disaffected daughter; and monstrous unicorns. Ok, that last part is not such a standard trope.

I went down the rabbit hole this morning digging into the story of the tapestries because I wondered how accurately the movie told the story of the tapestries – both about where they came from and what story the fabrics themselves told. Aside from the idea that the tapestries were telling a true story, the one bit of fictional speculation in the movie was where missing sections (in real life) from the tapestries were replaced by segments depicting more extreme unicorn violence. The rest stays fairly close to the story told within the tapestries.


Death of a Unicorn is undoubtedly violent and silly. It’s also an enjoyable, fun movie if you like your horror with a good dose of art history.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on How “Death of a Unicorn” connects with reality

Go For Broke – When old editorials become new again

I’ve been teaching Civil Rights Era Pulitzer Prize-winning editorials in my commentary class since 1988. And it seems crazy to me how some of them keep emerging to the surface from current news events over the years.

For example, Ralph McGill’s devastating “A Church, A School” from the Atlanta Constitution in 1958 was brought to mind for myself and many other people following the attack on a Pittsburgh synagogue in October of 2018.

Then last week I was reminded of Hodding Carter’s stirring 1946 defense of the all-Japanese-American 442nd Infantry Regiment for their bravery during WW II. These “Nisei” (second generation Japanese-Americans) were members of the most decorated unit from WWII with ” thousands of Purple Hearts, 21 Medals of Honor and eight Presidential Unit Citations.” Carter wrote for the Delta Democrat-Times in Greenville, Mississippi.

Carter’s editorial was made relevant once again when  the webpage discussing these brave troops was temporarily taken down as part of an effort to purge all “DEI content” from government web sites. (DEI stands for “diversity, equity and inclusion.”) The page was deleted along with Arlington National Cemetery’s  page highlighting the graves of the Tuskegee Airmen.

Here is the full text of Hodding Carter’s Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial “Go For Broke.” Please note this editorial contains racist language from the period depicting the Japanese.


Go For Broke
By Hodding Carter
Delta Democrat-Times
Greenville, Miss.
August 27, 1945

Hodding Carter, 1962

Company D of the 168th Regiment which is stationed in Leghorn, Italy, is composed altogether of white troops, some from the East, some from the South, some from the Midwest and the West Coast.

Company D made an unusual promise earlier this month. The promise was in the form of a communication to their fellow Americans of the 442nd Infantry Regiment and the 100th Infantry Battalion, whose motto is “Go for Broke,” and it was subscribed to unanimously by the officers and men of Company D.

In brief, the communication pledged the help of Company D in convincing “the folks back home that you are fully deserving of all the privileges with which we ourselves are bestowed.”

The soldiers to whom that promise was made are Japanese-Americans. In all of the United States Army, no troops have chalked up a better combat record. Their record is so good that these Nisei were selected by General Francis H. Oxx, commander of the military area in which they are stationed, to lead the final victory parade. So they marched, 3,000 strong, at the head of thousands of other Americans, their battle flag with three Presidential unit citation streamers floating above them, their commander, a Wisconsin white colonel, leading them.

Some of these Nisei must have been thinking of those soul-shaking days of last October, when they spearheaded the attacks that opened the Vosges Mountain doorway to Strasbourg. Some of them were probably remembering how they, on another bloody day, had snatched the Thirty-Six Division’s lost battalion of Texans from encircling Germans. And many of them were bearing scars from those two engagements which alone had cost the Nisei boys from Hawaii and the West Coast 2,300 causalities.

Perhaps these yellow-skinned Americans, to whose Japanese kinsmen we have administered a terrific and long overdue defeat, were holding their heads a little higher because of the pledge of their white fellow-soldiers and fellow-Americans of Company D. Perhaps when they gazed at their combat flag, the motto “Go for Broke” emblazoned thereon took a different meaning. “Go for Broke” is the Hawaiian-Japanese slang expression for shooting the works in a dice game.

The loyal Nisei have shot the works. From the beginning of the war, they have been on trial, in and out of uniform, in army camps and relocation centers, as combat troops in Europe and as frontline interrogators, propagandists and combat intelligence personnel in the Pacific where their capture meant prolonged and hideous torture. And even yet they have not satisfied their critics.

It is so easy for a dominant race to explain good or evil, patriotism or treachery, courage or cowardice in terms of skin color. So easy and so tragically wrong. Too many have committed that wrong against the loyal Nisei, who by the thousands have proved themselves good Americans, even while others of us, by our actions against them, have shown ourselves to be bad Americans. Nor is the end of this misconception in sight. Those Japanese-American soldiers, who paraded at Leghorn in commemoration of the defeat of the nation from which their fathers came, will meet other enemies, other obstacles as forbidding as those of war. A lot of people will begin saying, as soon as these boys take off their uniforms, that “a Jap is a Jap,” and that the Nisei deserve no consideration. A majority won’t say or believe this, but an active minority can have its way against an apathetic majority.

It seems to us that the Nisei slogan of “Go for Broke” could be adopted by all Americans of good will in the days ahead. We’ve got to shoot the works in a fight for tolerance. Those boys of Company D point the way. Japan’s surrender will be signed aboard the Missouri and General MacArthur’s part will be a symbolic “Show Me.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Go For Broke – When old editorials become new again

Honoring World Poetry Day 2025

In honor of World Poetry Day 2025, here are two of my favorite poems.


The Hemophiliac's Motorcycle book coverThe first is by West Virginia poet Tom Andrews, who in addition to being a great poet was also a first-generation hemophiliac who died way too young of blood-borne disease, as all too many hemophiliacs do. He grew up in an evangelical home, and questions about faith are frequent topics for him to interrogate with his poetry. This is drawn from his collection The Hemophiliac’s Motorcycle.

PRAYING WITH GEORGE HERBERT IN LATE WINTER
By Tom Andrews

1

In fits and starts, Lord,
our words work
the other side of language

where you lie if you can be said
to lie. Mercy upon
the priest who calls on you

to nurture and to terrorize
him, for you oblige.
Mercy upon you, breath’s engine

returning what is to what is.
Outside, light swarms
and particularizes the snow;

tree limbs crack with ice
and drop. I can say
there is a larger something

inside me. I can say,
“Gratitude is
a strange country.” But what

would I give to live there?

2

Something breaks in us,
and keeps breaking. Charity,
be severe with me.
Mercy, lay on your hands.

White robes on
the cypress tree. Sparrows
clot the fence posts;
they hop once and weave

through the bleached air.
Lord, I drift on the words
I speak to you —
the words take on

and utter me. in what
language are you not
what we say you are?
Surprise me, Lord, as a seed

surprises itself…

3

Today the sun has the inward look
of the eye of the Christ Child …
Grace falls at odd angles from heaven

to earth: my sins are bright sparks
in the dark of blamelessness.
Yes. From my window I watch a boy step

backwards down the snow-covered road,
studying his sudden boot tracks.
The wedding of his look and the world!

And for a moment, Lord, I think
I understand about you and silence…
But what a racket I make in telling you.


The Wild Swans at Coole coverThe second is from W.B. Yeats, perhaps best known for his rather apocalyptic “The Second Coming.”  But I love his more personal verse, especially “Her Praise,” which tells a story of desperate, unrequited love. Drawn from his collection The Wild Swans at Coole.

HER PRAISE
W.B. Yeats

She is foremost of those that I would hear praised.
I have gone about the house, gone up and down
As a man does who has published a new book
Or a young girl dressed out in her new gown,
And though I have turned the talk by hook or crook
Until her praise should be the uppermost theme,
A woman spoke of some new tale she had read,
A man confusedly in a half dream
As though some other name ran in his head.
She is foremost of those that I would hear praised.
I will talk no more of books or the long war
But walk by the dry thorn until I have found
Some beggar sheltering from the wind, and there
Manage the talk until her name come round.
If there be rags enough he will know her name
And be well pleased remembering it, for in the old days,
Though she had young men’s praise and old men’s blame,
Among the poor both old and young gave her praise.


Sorry I don’t have a W.H. Auden poem for you to go with these, but I have written about him here previously.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Honoring World Poetry Day 2025

When Rachel Maddow Stood Up Against MSNBC Management

MSNBC hosts Jen Psaki, Rachel Maddow & Joy Reid. Psaki will be taking the slot previously hosted four nights a week for Alex Wagner, who will be remaining with MSNBC. Reid will be leaving the network. (AP Photos from The Philadelphia Inquirer)

I don’t have a lot to say here about individual cable news/talk hosts. For one thing, I pay a lot more attention to newspapers and other print outlets than I do to broadcast/cable. But it’s also because I don’t think there’s that much interesting for me to say about hosts of clearly partisan shows.

But Monday night MSNBC star host Rachel Maddow exhibited some real courage on the air by criticizing her corporate bosses over two things:

  • The first was for the network removing hosts Joy Reid and Alex Wagner – the network’s only nonwhite primetime hosts. “That feels worse than bad, no matter who replaces them,” Maddow said. “That feels indefensible, and I do not defend it,” Maddow told her audience.
  • But she reserved her strongest words for the dismissal of the behind-the-scenes producers and staffers. She said on-air people always have to face that the time will come when they will be replaced, but that the loss of excellent researchers, editors and producers was inexcusable after all of their hard work. “It’s not the right way to treat people,” Maddow said, lambasting the decision makers at the network, “It’s inefficient, it’s unnecessary.”

It’s never surprising to see Maddow taking on her political targets fearlessly. That’s her job. But it is all too rare to see a network star taking on ownership. Obviously, MSNBC has a progressive point of view. Fox News is a conservative talk-show network. That’s who they are. But the common bias between them is that they almost always have a pro-ownership bias. And Rachel Maddow broke out of that last night.

Bravo, Rachel.


NOTE: MSNBC is owned by media giant Comcast. Comcast is currently looking to spin off its cable networks including USA, Oxygen, E!, SYFY and Golf Channel, as well as CNBC and MSNBC.

The clip below is cued up for the segment where she discusses the network’s actions.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on When Rachel Maddow Stood Up Against MSNBC Management

Return to “Pink Slime” Journalism: AI Scraping Edition

Last fall I had a post about the phenomenon known as “pink slime” journalism. Basically it’s where websites churn out content using either low-paid writers or generative AI. The “news” is either low-quality scrapings from legitimate sites or paid political propaganda. With the continued rise of AI, more and more sites are producing pink slime content to generate advertising revenue. The following is an update I added to the main post on pink slime.

Pink slime journalism sites have not gone away in the months since I first wrote about them. In fact, AI-powered pink slime sites continue to grow, infesting people’s news diet. (If you need a refresher, “pink slime,” in addition to being used to describe “finely chopped beef” trimmings,  has more recently been used to describe automated websites that publish poor-quality news stories and political propaganda while pretending to be high-quality local news sites.)

Nieman Lab ran a big story in January of 2025 about a network of AI-generated newsletters that operate as Good Day News. The AI-engine scans everything it can find about the community and turns it into brief, positive stories. In essence, Good Day takes the work done by local newspapers, radio stations, TV stations, and independent digital outlets  It then repackages the information and sells advertising to go with it.

The newsletters have testimonials that go with them. Local news publishers say the endorsements are fabricated. The publisher of the newsletters denies this, saying the names “anonymized” and the quotes “sanitized amalgamations of some of our favorite (and most common) testimonials.”

(Hmmm… I know what I would say to a student who made those statements.)

I highly recommend reading Andrew Deck’s story and would argue that this is a perfect example of pink slime journalism, even though Deck does not use the term.


Have you encountered pink slime sites? Leave a comment below!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Return to “Pink Slime” Journalism: AI Scraping Edition

Social Media Change 2025 Part 3: TikTok – The Hate/Love relationship

Social media are going through some big changes this winter. Meta/Facebook has changed its policies banning hate speech and deceptive information on its platforms; TikTok was facing a ban, shut itself down, and then came back with the blessings of he new US president; and niche Twitter replacement Bluesky has exploded in popularity.

Today we will look at the changing fortunes of the hugely popular Chinese-owned video sharing service TikTok.


So the Chinese-owned video sharing service TikTok is the social media channel young people love and that congress, state governments, and other politicians hate/love/rinse/repeat.

Why do young people love TikTok? Here’s a video illustrating some of the most popular videos from the service in 2024.

Why do federal and state politicians want to ban it?

At the core of these attempts is that TikTok is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance. The biggest worry about TikTok is the level of information it collects about users, such as your IP address and physical location while using it. TikTok also wants you to give it access to the contacts on your phone (i.e., your lists of phone numbers and e-mail addresses). When combined with location data, this could then be used to extrapolate whom you are meeting with or talking to. Your messages on the app can be read by the company, and your viewing history is open to them as well. Is this different from any other social media company? Nope. But other social media companies don’t have direct ties to the Chinese government, either. Another major concern is that China might use the social media channel for propaganda.

During President Trump’s first term of office, he signed an executive order banning TikTok in the United States, but the ban never went into effect when American tech company Oracle contracted to host of TikTok’s US data, though TikTok would still be owned by the Chinese company ByteDance.

Then in 2024, a strongly bipartisan bill was signed into law by President Biden banning TikTok from doing business in the United States unless ByteDance sold it. How bipartisan was the bill? It passed the House by a 352-65 vote (D 155/50/8; R 197/15/7).  The Senate then passed the ban as part of a larger bill including aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Gaza, by a vote of 79-18 (D 46/2/0; R 31/15/3; I 2/1/0).  As can be seen, the vote in favor of the ban was overwhelming.

But there has not a lot of popular support for banning TikTok outside of state legislatures and Congress. A Pew Research study in December 2023 found only 38% of U.S. adults said they would support a government ban of TikTok, down from 50% earlier in the year. People who use TikTok are even more likely to oppose banning it, reaching only 16% support.

ByteDance went to the US Supreme Court to keep the ban from going into effect arguing that it would violate both the company’s free speech rights as well as those of its users. The court, in an unsigned opinion with no dissents, rejected the free speech challenge, allowing the ban to go into effect on Sunday, January 19, 2025, the day before President Trump would be inaugurated for his second term. In response, ByteDance took TikTok dark in the US on Saturday evening, even though the Biden administration said they would not enforce the ban.

"Sorry, TikTok isn't available right now. "A law banning TikTok has been enacted in the U.S. Unfortunately, that means you can't use TikTok for now. We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate TikTok once he takes office. Please stay tuned!"

By Sunday afternoon, TikTok was more or less back with the promise of an executive order from President Trump extending the deadline for the sale of the company. While all seemed to be happy with TikTok, many of their American service providers were not as sanguine about violating a federal law that had large fines in it.

Amazon Web Services was not providing hosting, while both Apple and Google had taken down the app from their stores. TikTokers who had deleted the app from their phones found that they could not reinstall it after the Sunday deadline has passed. According to the Washington Post, both Apple and Google have long-standing policies to for follow the laws of the countries they operate in. Apple’s tech support website had a message up dated Jan. 27, 2025 stating that they would provide neither the app nor updates to it until the legal position of the company changed.

Why did President Trump go from supporting a TikTok ban to opposing it?

It can be hard to tell, but the change happened after he met with his wealthy donor hedge fund manager Jeff Yass in March of 2024. ABC News reports that Yass has opposed anti-TikTok efforts, supporting freedom to pick between whatever apps people want to. Yass also has a “significant stake” in ByteDance, according to the Wall Street Journal. In addition, Trump has also said that banning TikTok would only help Meta/Facebook, whom he dislikes: “I don’t want Facebook… doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!”  Also, by the end of 2024, President Trump had more than 14 million followers on TikTok he was reportedly reluctant to give up.

He also discussed his change of heart during a press conference early in 2025. We’ll close out with that.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Social Media Change 2025 Part 3: TikTok – The Hate/Love relationship